<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Type (biology) - Page 10 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=type_(biology)&amp;p=9">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=type_%28biology%29&amp;p=11">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>and <a href="page.php?w=zoology">zoology</a>. In the <a href="page.php?w=PhyloCode">PhyloCode</a>, type-based definitions are replaced by <a href="page.php?w=phylogenetic_nomenclature">phylogenetic definitions</a>.</p>

<p><big>Older terminology</big></p>
<p>In some older taxonomic works the word "type" has sometimes been used differently. The meaning was similar in the first Laws of Botanical Nomenclature, but has a meaning closer to the term <a href="page.php?w=taxon">taxon</a> in some other works:<blockquote><i>Ce seul caractère permet de distinguer ce type de toutes les autres espèces de la section. ... Après avoir étudié ces diverses formes, j'en arrivai à les considérer comme appartenant à un seul et même type spécifique.</i></blockquote><blockquote>Translation: This single character permits [one to] distinguish this type from all other species of the section ... After studying the diverse forms, I came to consider them as belonging to the one and the same specific type.</blockquote></p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=type_(biology)&amp;p=9">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=type_%28biology%29&amp;p=11">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
