<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Ouster clause - Page 11 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=ouster_clause&amp;p=10">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=ouster_clause&amp;p=12">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>by the courts at a later stage. However, ouster clauses have traditionally been viewed with suspicion by the courts. According to the 19th-century <a href="page.php?w=laissez-faire">laissez-faire</a> theory championed by <a href="page.php?w=A._V._Dicey">A. V. Dicey</a>, which <a href="page.php?w=Carol_Harlow">Carol Harlow</a> and Richard Rawlings termed as the "red-light approach" in their 1984 book Law and Administration, there should be a deep-rooted suspicion of governmental power and a desire to minimize the encroachment of the state on the</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=ouster_clause&amp;p=10">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=ouster_clause&amp;p=12">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
