<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Mental state - Page 12 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Mental_state&amp;p=11">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Mental_state&amp;p=13">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>this sensation. They can only be wrong about the non-mental causes, e.g. whether it is the consequence of bug bites or of a fungal infection. But various counterexamples have been presented to claims of infallibility, which is why this criterion is usually not accepted in <a href="page.php?w=contemporary_philosophy">contemporary philosophy</a>. One problem for all epistemic approaches to the mark of the mental is that they focus mainly on <a href="page.php?w=conscious">conscious</a> states but exclude <a href="page.php?w=Unconscious_mind">unconscious</a></p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Mental_state&amp;p=11">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Mental_state&amp;p=13">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
