<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Group polarization - Page 12 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=group_polarization&amp;p=11">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=group_polarization&amp;p=13">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>position more strongly after reading research that supported it. Lord et al. point out that it is reasonable for people to be less critical of research that supports their current position, but it seems less rational for people to significantly increase the strength of their attitudes when they read supporting evidence. When people had read both the research that supported their views and the research that did not, they tended to hold their original attitudes more strongly than before they received that information. These results should be understood</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=group_polarization&amp;p=11">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=group_polarization&amp;p=13">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
