<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Inventive step and non-obviousness - Page 12 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=inventive_step_and_non-obviousness&amp;p=11">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=inventive_step_and_non-obviousness&amp;p=13">3.Next</a>
</p>

<p><big> Jurisdictions </big></p>
<p><big> Canada </big></p>
<p>The requirement for non-obviousness is codified under section 28.3 of the <a href="page.php?w=Patent_Act_%28Canada%29">Patent Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. P-4)</a>.</p>

<p>The <a href="page.php?w=Supreme_Court_of_Canada">Supreme Court of Canada</a> affirmed the test for non-obviousness laid out in Windsurfing International Inc. v. Tabur Marine (Great Britain) Ltd. in <a href="page.php?w=Apotex_Inc._v._Sanofi-Synthelabo_Canada_Inc.">Apotex Inc. v. Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc.</a>:</p>

<p>
# Identify the</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=inventive_step_and_non-obviousness&amp;p=11">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=inventive_step_and_non-obviousness&amp;p=13">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
