<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Derivative work - Page 15 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Derivative_work&amp;p=14">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Derivative_work&amp;p=16">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>embodied in the earlier work for the latter work to satisfy copyright law's requirement of <a href="page.php?w=originality">originality</a>.</p>

<p>Although serious emphasis on originality, at least so designated, began with the Supreme Court's 1991 decision in <a href="page.php?w=Feist_v._Rural">Feist v. Rural</a>, some pre-Feist lower court decisions addressed this requirement in relation to derivative works. In Durham Industries, Inc. v. Tomy Corp. and earlier in L. Batlin & Son, Inc. v. Snyder. the Second Circuit held that a derivative work</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Derivative_work&amp;p=14">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Derivative_work&amp;p=16">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
