<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Problem of evil - Page 15 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=problem_of_evil&amp;p=14">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=problem_of_evil&amp;p=16">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>(C1) follows of necessity. To show that the first premise is plausible, subsequent versions tend to expand on it, such as this modern example:</p>

<p>Both of these arguments are understood to be presenting two forms of the 'logical' problem of evil. They attempt to show that the assumed premises lead to a <a href="page.php?w=logical">logical</a> <a href="page.php?w=contradiction">contradiction</a> that cannot all be correct. Most philosophical debate has focused on the suggestion that God would want to prevent all evils and therefore cannot</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=problem_of_evil&amp;p=14">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=problem_of_evil&amp;p=16">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
