<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Contractualism - Page 16 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=contractualism&amp;p=15">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=contractualism&amp;p=17">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>in scope because it only applies to "what we owe to each other" and whatever that is relevant among the contracting parties. Therefore, extending moral relevance beyond the mutually benefited parties (such as animals or future people) becomes very hard to defend within contractualism.</p>

<p><big> Contractualism vs. deontology </big></p>
<p>Contractualism can be considered a <a href="page.php?w=Deontology">deontological</a> framework, and like all other non-consequentialist theories, including <a href="page.php?w=Kantian_ethics">Kantian ethics</a>, contractualism</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=contractualism&amp;p=15">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=contractualism&amp;p=17">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
