<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="August Schleicher - Page 17 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=August_Schleicher&amp;p=16">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=August_Schleicher&amp;p=18">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>scholars <a href="page.php?w=Rasmus_Christian_Rask">Rasmus Rask</a> and <a href="page.php?w=Karl_Verner">Karl Verner</a> and the German scholar <a href="page.php?w=Jacob_Grimm">Jacob Grimm</a>.</p>

<p>The first linguist to offer reconstructed forms from a <a href="page.php?w=proto-language">proto-language</a> was Schleicher, in his Compendium der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen, originally published in 1861. Here is Schleicher's explanation of why he offered reconstructed forms:<blockquote>In the present work an attempt is made to set forth the inferred <a href="page.php?w=Proto-Indo-European_language">Indo-European original language</a> side by side with its really existent derived languages. Besides the advantages offered by such a plan, in setting immediately before the eyes of the student the final results of the investigation in a more concrete form, and thereby rendering easier his insight into the nature of particular <a href="page.php?w=Indo-European_languages">Indo-European languages</a>, there is, I think, another of no less importance gained by it, namely that it shows the baselessness of the assumption that the non-Indian Indo-European languages were derived from Old-Indian (<a href="page.php?w=Sanskrit">Sanskrit</a>).</blockquote></p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=August_Schleicher&amp;p=16">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=August_Schleicher&amp;p=18">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
