<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Primate - Page 17 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Primate&amp;p=16">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Primate&amp;p=18">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>as the non-human apes.</p>

<p>As of 2021, there is no consensus as to whether to accept traditional (that is, common), but paraphyletic, names or to use monophyletic names only; or to use 'new' common names or adaptations of old ones. Both competing approaches can be found in biological sources, often in the same work, and sometimes by the same author. Thus, Benton defines apes to include humans, then he repeatedly uses ape-like to mean 'like an ape rather than a human'; and when discussing the reaction of others to a new fossil he writes of</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Primate&amp;p=16">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Primate&amp;p=18">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
