<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Contractual term - Page 17 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=contractual_term&amp;p=16">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=contractual_term&amp;p=18">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>is so obvious that it goes without saying. Furthermore, there must be one and only one thing that would be implied by the parties. For example, in <a href="page.php?w=Codelfa_Construction_Pty_Ltd_v_State_Rail_Authority_of_NSW">Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW</a>, a term regarding the inability of construction company to work three shifts a day could not be implied because it was unclear what form it would have taken. In <a href="page.php?w=English_law">English law</a>, this principle was established in the case of Spring</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=contractual_term&amp;p=16">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=contractual_term&amp;p=18">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
