<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Logical disjunction - Page 17 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=logical_disjunction&amp;p=16">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=logical_disjunction&amp;p=18">3.Next</a>
</p>

<p><big> Natural language </big></p>
<p>Disjunction in <a href="page.php?w=natural_language">natural language</a>s does not precisely match the interpretation of  in classical logic. Notably, classical disjunction is inclusive while natural language disjunction is often understood exclusively, as the following English example typically would be.</p>

<p>
:* Mary is eating an apple or a pear.</p>

<p>This inference has sometimes been understood as an <a href="page.php?w=entailment">entailment</a>, for instance by <a href="page.php?w=Alfred_Tarski">Alfred Tarski</a>,</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=logical_disjunction&amp;p=16">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=logical_disjunction&amp;p=18">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
