<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Phrase - Page 19 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Phrase&amp;p=18">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Phrase&amp;p=20">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>these views persists due to conflicting results from the standard empirical diagnostics of phrasehood such as <a href="page.php?w=constituent_%28linguistics%29">constituency tests</a>.</p>

<p>The distinction is illustrated with the following examples:</p>

<p>
::The Republicans <b>may nominate Newt</b>. <small>- Finite VP in bold</small><br/>
::The Republicans may <b>nominate Newt</b>. <small>- Non-finite VP in bold</small></p>

<p>The syntax trees of this sentence are next:</p>

<p>
::</p>

<p>The constituency tree on the left shows the finite</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Phrase&amp;p=18">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Phrase&amp;p=20">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
