<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Polis - Page 19 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Polis&amp;p=18">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Polis&amp;p=20">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>and the later polis seems to have been unbroken." It seems a matter of simple logic that if Athens was a Hellenic polis in the time of the Hellenic poleis and was continuous with the pre-Doric city phase, then pre-Doric Athens must have been a Hellenic polis even then. The model fails in its chief instance.</p>

<p>A second approach to the modelling of the polis is not to use the word polis at all, but to translate it into the language of the historiographer. The model is thus inherent in the translation, which has the disadvantage of incorporating</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Polis&amp;p=18">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Polis&amp;p=20">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
