<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Dependency grammar - Page 19 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=dependency_grammar&amp;p=18">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=dependency_grammar&amp;p=20">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>point to these conventions is that they are just that, namely conventions. They do not influence the basic commitment to dependency as the relation that is grouping syntactic units.</p>

<p><big>Types of dependencies</big></p>
<p>The dependency representations above (and further below) show syntactic dependencies. Indeed, most work in dependency grammar focuses on syntactic dependencies. Syntactic dependencies are, however, just one of three or four types of dependencies. <a href="page.php?w=Meaning-text_theory">Meaning-text theory</a>, for instance,</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=dependency_grammar&amp;p=18">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=dependency_grammar&amp;p=20">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
