<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Administration of justice - Page 2 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Administration_of_justice&amp;p=1">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Administration_of_justice&amp;p=3">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>to <a href="page.php?w=New_South_Wales">New South Wales</a>. Counsel for the appellant said that Whicker v Hume (1858) decided that section 24 referred not to laws generally, but only to laws as to modes of procedure, and that the Nullum Tempus Act did not deal merely with procedure. The Lord Chancellor said that the Act 9 Geo 4 c 83 <a href="page.php?w=prima_facie">prima facie</a> "applied the Nullum Tempus Act to the Colony in question as much as if it had re-enacted it for that Colony." He then said:</p>

<p><big>Canada</big></p>
<p><a href="page.php?w=Section_92%2814%29_of_the_Constitution_Act%2C_1867">Section 92(14) of the Constitution Act, 1867</a>,</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Administration_of_justice&amp;p=1">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Administration_of_justice&amp;p=3">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
