<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Consistency - Page 2 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=consistency&amp;p=1">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=consistency&amp;p=3">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>sentences provable from  under some (specified, possibly implicitly) formal deductive system. The set of axioms  is <b>consistent</b> when there is no formula  such that  and . A trivial theory (i.e., one which proves every sentence in the language of the theory) is clearly inconsistent. Conversely, in an <a href="page.php?w=principle_of_explosion">explosive</a> <a href="page.php?w=formal_system">formal system</a> (e.g., classical or intuitionistic propositional or first-order logics) every inconsistent theory is trivial. Consistency of a theory</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=consistency&amp;p=1">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=consistency&amp;p=3">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
