<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Origin of language - Page 20 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Origin_of_language&amp;p=19">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Origin_of_language&amp;p=21">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>all such theories not so much wrong--they occasionally offer peripheral insights--as naïve and irrelevant. The problem with these theories is that they rest on the assumption that once early humans had discovered a workable mechanism for linking sounds with meanings, language would automatically have evolved.</p>

<p>Much earlier, <a href="page.php?w=Islamic_Golden_Age">medieval Muslim scholars</a> developed theories on the origin of language. Their theories were of five general types:<br/>
# Naturalist: There is a natural relationship between</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Origin_of_language&amp;p=19">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Origin_of_language&amp;p=21">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
