<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Core sample - Page 20 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=core_sample&amp;p=19">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=core_sample&amp;p=21">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>then becomes a matter of policy for the client (in an industrial setting) or of great controversy (in a context without an overriding authority). Recording that there are discrepancies, for whatever reason, retains the possibility of correcting an incorrect decision at a later date; destroying the "incorrect" depth data makes it impossible to correct a mistake later. Any system for retaining and archiving data and core samples needs to be designed so that dissenting opinion like this can be retained.</p>

<p>If core samples from a campaign are</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=core_sample&amp;p=19">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=core_sample&amp;p=21">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
