<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Oldowan - Page 23 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Oldowan&amp;p=22">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Oldowan&amp;p=24">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>caused a crisis of definition. Because Abbevillian did not necessarily precede Acheulean and both traditions had flakes and bifaces, it became difficult to differentiate the two. It was in this spirit that many artifacts formerly considered Abbevillian were labeled Acheulean. In consideration of the difficulty, some preferred to name both phases Acheulean. When the topic of Abbevillian came up, it was simply put down as a phase of Acheulean. Whatever was from Africa was Oldowan, and whatever from Europe, Acheulean.</p>

<p>The solution to the</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Oldowan&amp;p=22">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Oldowan&amp;p=24">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
