<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Samkhya - Page 28 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Samkhya&amp;p=27">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Samkhya&amp;p=29">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>pratijna (hypothesis), hetu (a reason), and drshtanta (examples). The hypothesis must further be broken down into two parts, state the ancient Indian scholars: sadhya (that idea which needs to proven or disproven) and paksha (the object on which the sadhya is predicated). The inference is conditionally true if sapaksha (positive examples as evidence) are present, and if vipaksha (negative examples as counter-evidence) are absent. For rigor, the Indian philosophies also state further epistemic steps. For example, they demand Vyapti - the requirement</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Samkhya&amp;p=27">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Samkhya&amp;p=29">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
