<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Judicial interpretation - Page 3 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Judicial_interpretation&amp;p=2">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Judicial_interpretation&amp;p=4">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>and <a href="page.php?w=School_integration_in_the_United_States">desegregation</a> as in the <a href="page.php?w=Brown_v_Board_of_Education">Brown v Board of Education</a> decision, and <a href="page.php?w=Abortion_in_the_United_States">abortion rights</a> as in the <a href="page.php?w=Roe_v_Wade">Roe v Wade</a> decision. As a result, how justices interpret the constitution, and the ways in which they approach this task has a political aspect. Terms describing types of judicial interpretation can be ambiguous; for example, the term judicial conservatism</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Judicial_interpretation&amp;p=2">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Judicial_interpretation&amp;p=4">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
