<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Critique of Practical Reason - Page 30 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Critique_of_Practical_Reason&amp;p=29">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Critique_of_Practical_Reason&amp;p=31">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>Kant makes his clearest and most explicit formulation of the position he adopts with respect to the question of the fundamental nature of morality. Kant's position is that moral goodness, which consists in following the rule of the categorical imperative, is more fundamental to ethics than good consequences, and that it is the right motivations--an obligation to duty--which is criterial for defining a person as good. Hence, Kant is a <a href="page.php?w=deontologist">deontologist</a>, in the terminology of contemporary philosophy, particularly</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Critique_of_Practical_Reason&amp;p=29">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Critique_of_Practical_Reason&amp;p=31">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
