<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Essentially contested concept - Page 30 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=essentially_contested_concept&amp;p=29">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=essentially_contested_concept&amp;p=31">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>without ever consulting Gallie's work, have led many philosophers to conclude that "essentially disputed concepts" would have been far better choice for Gallie's meaning, for at least three reasons:</p>

<p>
#Gallie's term has led many to the mistaken belief that he spoke of hotly disputed, rather than essentially disputed concepts.<br/>
#Expressly stipulating that a specific issue can never be resolved, and then calling it a "contest" seems both absurd and misleading.<br/>
#Any assertion that "essentially contested" concepts are <a href="page.php?w=Commensurability_%28ethics%29">incommensurable</a></p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=essentially_contested_concept&amp;p=29">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=essentially_contested_concept&amp;p=31">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
