<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Hard and soft science - Page 4 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Hard_and_soft_science&amp;p=3">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Hard_and_soft_science&amp;p=5">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p><a href="page.php?w=Rigour">rigor</a>, "development", and whether they are <a href="page.php?w=Basic_Science">basic</a> or <a href="page.php?w=Applied_science">applied</a>.</p>

<p><a href="page.php?w=Philosophy_of_science">Philosophers</a> and <a href="page.php?w=History_of_science">historians of science</a> have questioned the relationship between these characteristics and perceived hardness or softness. The more "developed" hard sciences do not necessarily have a greater degree of <a href="page.php?w=scientific_consensus">consensus</a> or</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Hard_and_soft_science&amp;p=3">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Hard_and_soft_science&amp;p=5">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
