<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Intention in English law - Page 4 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Intention_in_English_law&amp;p=3">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Intention_in_English_law&amp;p=5">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>to restore the position originally at common law. In Frankland v The Queen, Lord Ackner held DPP v Smith to be incorrect insofar as it required objective foresight in determining intention of murder, saying that the common law reflected s 8 of the 1967 Act.</p>

<p>Given that s8 of the Criminal Justice Act 1967 now entitles a <a href="page.php?w=jury">jury</a> to draw reasonable inferences from all the evidence, Wien J. said in R v Belfon that:</p>

<p><blockquote>Foresight and recklessness are evidence from which intent may be inferred but they cannot be equated...with intent.</blockquote></p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Intention_in_English_law&amp;p=3">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Intention_in_English_law&amp;p=5">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
