<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Philosophy of testimony - Page 4 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Philosophy_of_testimony&amp;p=3">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Philosophy_of_testimony&amp;p=5">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>ideal of rationality captured in the motto of the <a href="page.php?w=Royal_Society">Royal Society</a> - 'Nullius in verba (Into the word of no one)'. The Royal Society interprets this as "take nobody's word for it." Crudely put, the question is: 'How can testimony give us knowledge when we have no reasons of our own?'</p>

<p>Coady suggests that there are two approaches to this problem:<br/>
*<b>Reductivism</b>, which seeks to 'reduce' or re-describe our behaviour such that it is not at odds with the traditional view of knowledgeand<br/>
*<b>Anti-reductivism</b>,</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Philosophy_of_testimony&amp;p=3">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Philosophy_of_testimony&amp;p=5">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
