<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Identity of indiscernibles - Page 4 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=identity_of_indiscernibles&amp;p=3">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=identity_of_indiscernibles&amp;p=5">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>and <a href="page.php?w=Samuel_Clarke">Clarke</a> in the <a href="page.php?w=Leibniz-Clarke_correspondence">Leibniz-Clarke correspondence</a>).</p>

<p>Some philosophers have decided, however, that it is important to exclude certain predicates (or purported predicates) from the principle in order to avoid either triviality or contradiction. An example (detailed below) is the predicate that denotes whether an object is equal to x (often considered a valid predicate). As a consequence, there are a few different versions of the principle in the</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=identity_of_indiscernibles&amp;p=3">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=identity_of_indiscernibles&amp;p=5">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
