<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Rule of four - Page 4 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=rule_of_four&amp;p=3">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=rule_of_four&amp;p=5">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>to grant a petition for certiorari, but the ancillary aspects of it have changed throughout the years, and Justices have not always agreed about these aspects.</p>

<p>A good example is found in dueling opinions (for themselves alone, not opinions of the Court), in Rogers v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., Justice Frankfurter and Justice <a href="page.php?w=John_Marshall_Harlan_II">John Marshall Harlan II</a> discussed their understandings of the conventions surrounding the Rule of Four. In particular, the Justices disagreed as to whether once certiorari</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=rule_of_four&amp;p=3">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=rule_of_four&amp;p=5">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
