<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Active queue management - Page 5 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Active_queue_management&amp;p=4">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Active_queue_management&amp;p=6">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>of their parameters in order to provide good performance. These systems are not optimally behaved from a <a href="page.php?w=control_theory">control theory</a> perspective.  Modern AQM disciplines (ARED, <a href="page.php?w=Blue_%28queue_management_algorithm%29">Blue</a>, <a href="page.php?w=PI_controller">PI</a>, <a href="page.php?w=CoDel">CoDel</a>, <a href="page.php?w=CAKE_%28queue_management_algorithm%29">CAKE</a>) are self-tuning, and can be run with their default parameters in most circumstances.</p>

<p>Network engineers have historically</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Active_queue_management&amp;p=4">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Active_queue_management&amp;p=6">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
