<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Propensity probability - Page 5 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=propensity_probability&amp;p=4">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=propensity_probability&amp;p=6">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>p of producing the outcome E means that those exact conditions, if repeated indefinitely, would produce an outcome sequence in which E occurred with limiting relative frequency p. Thus the propensity p for E to occur depends upon G:.  For Popper then, a deterministic experiment would have propensity 0 or 1 for each outcome, since those generating conditions would have the same outcome on each trial.  In other words, non-trivial propensities (those that differ from 0 and 1) imply something less than determinism and yet still causal dependence</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=propensity_probability&amp;p=4">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=propensity_probability&amp;p=6">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
