<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Dignity - Page 6 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Dignity&amp;p=5">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Dignity&amp;p=7">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>term. However, it is rarely defined outright in <a href="page.php?w=political">political</a>, <a href="page.php?w=legal">legal</a>, and <a href="page.php?w=scientific">scientific</a> discussions.  International proclamations have thus far left dignity undefined, and scientific commentators, such as those arguing against <a href="page.php?w=genetic_research">genetic research</a> and <a href="page.php?w=algeny">algeny</a>, cite dignity as a reason but are ambiguous about its application.</p>

<p><a href="page.php?w=Aurel_Kolnai">Aurel Kolnai</a> states:<blockquote>Dignity also tends to connote the features of self-contained serenity, of a certain inward and toned-down but yet translucent and perceptible power of self-assertion: the dignified type of character is chary of emphatic activity rather than sullenly passive, perhaps impassive rather than impassible, patient rather than anxiously defensive, and devoid but not incapable of aggressiveness.</blockquote></p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Dignity&amp;p=5">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Dignity&amp;p=7">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
