<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Mathematical descriptions of opacity - Page 7 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Mathematical_descriptions_of_opacity&amp;p=6">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Mathematical_descriptions_of_opacity&amp;p=8">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>use the convention on the left (with e<sup>-i?t</sup>), while electrical engineers use the convention on the right (with e<sup>+i?t</sup>, for example see <a href="page.php?w=electrical_impedance">electrical impedance</a>). The distinction is irrelevant for an unattenuated wave, but becomes relevant in some cases below. For example, there are two definitions of <a href="page.php?w=refractive_index">complex refractive index</a>, one with a positive imaginary part and one with a negative imaginary part, derived from the two different conventions.</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=Mathematical_descriptions_of_opacity&amp;p=6">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=Mathematical_descriptions_of_opacity&amp;p=8">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
