<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Cultural icon - Page 7 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=cultural_icon&amp;p=6">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=cultural_icon&amp;p=8">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>has drawn criticism from some. For example, a writer in <a href="page.php?w=Liverpool_Daily_Post">Liverpool Daily Post</a> calls "iconic" "a word that makes my flesh creep", a word "pressed into service to describe almost anything." Mark Larson of the <a href="page.php?w=Christian_Examiner_%28California%29">Christian Examiner</a> labeled "iconic" as an overused word, finding over 18,000 uses of "iconic" in news stories alone, with another 30,000 for "icon". Journalists in search of less clichéd alternatives could instead consider: distinctive,</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=cultural_icon&amp;p=6">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=cultural_icon&amp;p=8">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
