1.Previous
3.Next

in the second century. This is supported by most of the traditional hagiographical sources as well. Archaeological evidence at Amaravati indicates that if this is true, the king may have been Yajña Sri Satakarni (c. second half of the 2nd century). On the basis of this association, Nagarjuna is conventionally placed at around 150-250 CE.Walser also thinks that it is most likely that when Nagarjuna wrote the Ratnavali, he lived in a mixed monastery (with Mahayanists

1.Previous
3.Next