<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="card1" title="Res gestae - Page 8 - Wikipedia">
<p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=res_gestae&amp;p=7">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=res_gestae&amp;p=9">3.Next</a>
</p>
<p>akin to the English category of "emotionally overpowering".</p>

<p>When considering whether to admit hearsay evidence through the res gestae, case law strongly advises judges to consider whether "the possibility of concoction or distortion [can] be disregarded".</p>

<p>There has been significant criticism of the exception by judges and legal academics. In 1997, the <a href="page.php?w=Law_Commission_%28England_and_Wales%29">Law Commission</a> argued that the primary use of it was to allow evidence from unavailable witnesses (including those</p><p>
<a accesskey="1" href="page.php?w=res_gestae&amp;p=7">1.Previous</a><br />
<a accesskey="3" href="page.php?w=res_gestae&amp;p=9">3.Next</a>
</p>

<do type="prev" label="Search">
        <go href="search.wml"/>
</do>

</card>
</wml>
